Both the coloniser and the colonised happen to be victims of colonialism as exhibited from both novels and how each contributed to environmental mortification. To understand this you have to first understand a bit of SA's history.
The Grass is Singing (1950) and Waiting for the Rain (1975) may be viewed as synchronous novels that expose the exclusive lives of both the coloniser and the colonised under colonialism, in relation to the environment. Answer (1 of 3): My father-in-law regularly use some variation of this, even though he speaks English reasonably well.
The study found that by reading The Grass is Singing (1950) and Waiting for the Rain (1975) as contemporaries, they can be testament to some wealthy accounts as the novels provide a coherent shape of the realistic operations of colonialism in totality. The study is a desktop qualitative research and it employed content analysis in the interpretation and analysis of the chosen novels. For each quote, you can also see the other characters and themes related to it (each theme is indicated by its own dot and). Applying post-colonialism to the analysis of a text calls for the inclusion and consideration of a number of themes such as race, class, sexual orientation, cultural beliefs, religion, identity, double consciousness, hybridity, rootlessness, trauma and relationships (master/servant). The The Grass is Singing quotes below are all either spoken by Mary Turner or refer to Mary Turner. The research aimed at elucidating on the remarkable relationship between human beings and nature as presented in literary texts. Ecocriticism unifies humanity and nature, whilst post-colonialism focuses on issues pertaining to power, religion and culture, with regards to humanity. This thesis analyses The Grass is Singing (1950) by Doris Lessing and Waiting for the Rain (1975) by Charles Mungoshi from a post-colonial ecocritical perspective.